Success is first and foremost doing what God has asked us to do, doing it his way, and in his timing.
Years ago, when I was first wrestling with redefining success, I imagined what it might be like to come before Godâs throne at the end of my earthly life and say, âHere, God, is what I have done for you. New Life now has 10,000 people.â Then he would respond, âPete, I love you, but that was not what I gave you to do. That task was for a pastor in another part of New York.â
Have you ever considered that your ministry, organization, or team may be growing and yet actually failing? Think with me for a moment about some of Godâs faithful and, hence, most successful leaders:
- Jesus said of John the Baptist, âAmong those born of women none is greater than Johnâ (Luke 7:28). Yet, if we were to create a bar chart on the size of Johnâs ministry over time, it would demonstrate a peak followed by a steady and precipitous decline.
- The prophets Jeremiah and Isaiah both served God with passion and obedience, but they were mostly written off by an unresponsive remnantâdefinitely not what anyone likely considered success.
- Jesus didnât wring his hands and question his preaching strategy when âmany of his disciples turned away and deserted himâ (Jn. 6:66). He remained content, knowing he was in the Fatherâs will. He had a larger perspective of what God was doing.
Itâs hard to see how any of the names on this list would be considered successful in most leadership circles today. And yet the Bible makes it clear that God approved of their ministries. The implications are that we may well be growing our ministries but nevertheless failing.
Embracing Godâs definition of success for New Life over the years was initially difficult for me to accept. It slowed me down and I suddenly felt like I didnât look as good as the leaders of other more successful ministries to which I compared myself.
It meant that New Life had one objective: to become what God had called us to become, and to do what God had called us to doâregardless of where any of that might lead us. It meant that all the previous markersâincreased attendance, bigger and better programs, a larger budgetâhad to take a backseat to this one.
I encourage you to pause and reflect for a moment. What might change in your context if you were to define success not by the numbers but as radically doing Godâs will? What external markers might become less important? What internal markers might become more important? What fears or anxieties are you aware of as you even consider such questions?
Believe me, I understand how disorienting these questions might be. But I also know how rewarding and freeing it is to live and lead from the center of Godâs definition of success. If you are willing to take some risks and live with the tensions, I can promise you wonât regret it.
-Pete